100日間返金保証 世界中へ送料無料
612,263作品一覧 52,888アーティスト一覧 5,406美術館・博物館 32言語設定
John Deeの肖像画

John Deeの名作:最も有名な作品トップ4選(ランキング形式)

11月 2026 更新 · 当サイトの人気スコア(各作品の検索数、閲覧数、注文数)に基づくランキング · 4点の John Deeの作品がカタログにあります

クイック回答

John Deeの最も有名な作品はObsidian Mirror (1400)です。 Four Castles Gold Disk (1560)とSigillum Dei, Wax Disks (1582)は、2と3です。 当カタログに含まれるJohn Deeの全4作品の中から、特に有名な4作品を、制作年と所蔵美術館とともにランキング形式でご紹介します。これらを参考に、ご注文する絵画をお選びください。

1527 – 1608

John Deeの名作トップ10ランキング

John Deeの年代別:トップ・ペインティングズ

John Deeの作品23年分、1560年から1582年まで:年表を辿りながら、あなたの壁に飾るのにふさわしい時代を見つけてください。

年別作品数

年を選択して作品を見る

John Dee の絵画に関するよくある質問

John Deeの最も有名な作品は何ですか?回答を表示

Obsidian Mirror (1400)が第1位、次いでFour Castles Gold Disk (1560)、Sigillum Dei, Wax Disks (1582)の順となっています。

John Deeによる作品は何点掲載されていますか?回答を表示

John Deeによる作品が4点、1560年から1582年にかけてのものがカタログに掲載されています。

John Deeの最も有名な作品は、どの時代のものですか?回答を表示

1582年:ここにランクインしている4点の絵画のうち、2点がその時代の作品で、Sigillum Dei, Wax Disksなどが含まれます。

John Deeによる最も初期の作品と、最も後年の有名な作品は何ですか?回答を表示

このページで最も古い作品: Four Castles Gold Disk (1560)。最新の作品: Sigillum Dei, Wax Disks (1582)。

John Deeの複製画を注文することはできますか?回答を表示

はい。このページに掲載されているすべての絵画は、手描きの油彩複製画、またはプリントとしてご注文いただけます。絵画を選択し、サイズを選んで注文を確定してください。

アーティストについて: John Dee

The Life and Family of John Dee

John Dee was an English polymath and occultist, a man whose intellectual reach extended far beyond the boundaries of traditional scholarship. Born on 13 July 1527, he occupied a space between rigorous science and the esoteric. His lineage began with his father, Rowland Dee, providing the foundation for a life defined by the pursuit of hidden knowledge. He was not a painter or a visual creator, but a thinker whose influence was felt through his vast intellectual inquiries and his involvement in the occult sciences of the sixteenth century.

Family life for Dee was marked by specific, documented connections that anchored his complex existence. His son, Arthur Dee, was born on 13 July 1579. This lineage continued through a life spent largely in Mortlake, London, where he maintained his residence and his extensive collections. The weight of his intellectual pursuits often intersected with his personal associations, creating a life that was as much about human relationships as it was about the study of the unknown.

The end of his life remains a matter of slight historical debate, with records suggesting he died in 1608 or 1609. Regardless of the exact year, the impact of his work remains a concrete part of the history of English intellectualism. He left behind a legacy of manuscripts and tracts, including the Cotton Vitellius C. VII, which serves as a primary record of his own life and thoughts. His existence was defined by this tension between the documented word and the unseen forces he sought to understand.

Travels and Connections in Europe

John Dee was an English polymath and occultist whose influence relied heavily on his ability to navigate the complex social and intellectual circles of the European continent. His movements were not mere sightseeing; they were strategic engagements with the power structures of the era. He was a visitor to the court of Rudolf II, a connection that placed him at the center of significant intellectual exchange. This relationship was solidified during his time in Prague, where he visited the court of Rudolf II between 1584 and 1585. These interactions demonstrate a man deeply embedded in the high-stakes political and esoteric currents of the late sixteenth century.

His social network was as diverse as it was specialized. He maintained a close friendship with Edward Kelley, a relationship that likely defined much of his later intellectual pursuits. Beyond these personal ties, Dee moved through a web of associates and acquaintances that spanned various social strata. He was connected to William of Rosenberg and Nicholas Starkie, figures who represent the breadth of his professional and social reach. These were not casual acquaintances but part of a structured existence defined by proximity to power and the exchange of specialized knowledge. His presence in Prague and his ties to the court of Rudolf II confirm that his work was never isolated to a single locale, but was instead part of a broader, continental dialogue.