Quick answer
The most famous George Roth painting is The Death of General James Wolfe (1727-1759) (after Benjamin West PRA) (1784); the original is in the Quebec House, Westerham. Out of the 1 works by George Roth in our catalogue, these are the 1 most famous, ranked, each with its year and museum, so you can choose the painting to order.
Top 10 George Roth paintings, ranked
Museums holding George Roth's originals
The museum that holds the most of the paintings on this page.
| Museum | City | Works by George Roth | Paintings from this list |
|---|---|---|---|
| Westerham | 1 | The Death of General James Wolfe (1727-1759) (after Benjamin West PRA) |
George Roth by year: the top paintings
All dated George Roth paintings on this page are from 1784, listed here by rank.
Works per year
Select a year to see its paintings.
George Roth paintings: common questions
What is the most famous painting by George Roth?Show answer
The Death of General James Wolfe (1727-1759) (after Benjamin West PRA) (1784) ranks first.
What was George Roth's age when The Death of General James Wolfe (1727-1759) (after Benjamin West PRA) was painted?Show answer
George Roth was 45: The Death of General James Wolfe (1727-1759) (after Benjamin West PRA) is dated 1784, and George Roth was born in 1739.
How many works by George Roth do you list?Show answer
1 works by George Roth are in our catalogue.
Where are the original George Roth paintings kept?Show answer
Mainly in Quebec House (Westerham). See the museum table above for the full list.
Can I order a George Roth reproduction?Show answer
Yes. Every painting on this page can be ordered as a hand-painted oil reproduction or a print. Open the painting, choose the size and place your order.
About the artist: George Roth
The Lineage of a London Painter
George Roth was a man defined by his connections to the professional art circles of the eighteenth century. Born around 1739, he was the son of George Roth, an artist who worked under the direction of Allan Ramsay, specifically focusing on the rendering of drapery. This familial link provided a technical foundation that Roth carried into his own career. He did not merely exist in the shadow of his father; he established his own presence through a series of portraits and exhibitions that spanned the major hubs of British art life.
His professional footprint was not confined to a single city. He moved between the bustling atmosphere of London and the more refined setting of Bath. This mobility allowed him to access diverse markets and social circles. By the time he was exhibiting at the Society of Arts between 1771 and 1776, he had already carved out a niche as a reliable hand in the portraiture market. His work was a product of a specific era of British painting, where the ability to capture a sitter's likeness was the primary currency of the trade.
A Record of Commissions and Presence
The surviving evidence of Roth's output reveals a painter focused on the social realities of his time. His work was not about abstract concepts but about the people who formed the backbone of provincial and urban society. His commissions often centered on specific families, leaving behind a tangible record of their existence through oil and pigment.
- Portraits of the Beckwith and Webster families from Ipswich.
- A series of family portraits including William Healey and Sarah Burks, dated 1793.
- Works exhibited at the Society of Arts during the 1770s.
His connection to East Anglia is particularly evident in his subject matter. The presence of sitters from Ipswich and the involvement of related artists in Norwich and Great Yarmouth suggest a family network deeply embedded in the regional art scene. This was a professional dynasty, one where names like Roth were synonymous with the production of portraiture across several English counties.
The Final Years in Westminster
Roth's career concluded in the same urban environment that had facilitated his rise. He died in 1821, leaving behind a legacy tied to the practicalities of the portraitist's craft. He was buried at St Anne, Westminster, at the age of 82. His life reflects the steady, industrious nature of the eighteenth-century painter, a man whose value was measured by the accuracy of his likenesses and his ability to navigate the competitive art markets of London and Bath.